Posted: May 25th, 2022

Strategic Planning & Strategy Formulation

Strategic Planning & Strategy Formulation

Case: Strategic Planning & Strategy Formulation

Case Assignment — Comcast

Comcast’s Current Strategy

Current Event Blog

Discussion Question: Strategy Planning and Formulation

Case

Strategy Implementation & Evaluation

Current Event Blog 4 — Strategy Implementation & Evaluation

Discussion Question: Strategy Implementation and Evaluation

Reflective Discussion

Case: Strategic Planning & Strategy Formulation

Case Assignment — Comcast

Comcast’s Current Strategy

Comcast has developed a current business strategy that is completely focused on the customer. The company has positioned itself at the “intersection of media and technology” (Corporate.comcast.com, 2016). The company seems to be doing well and in 2015 the company had raised their dividend by 10%, for the eighth consecutive year.

The present strategy of the company is to focus on innovation and enhancing of customer experience and being innovative at the same time. The company claims that this strategy has paid off well for them. In fact, this business strategy of the company was adopted less than a year ago in May. To give their customers a unique experience when they deal with the company, Comcast started off by announcing hiring 5,500 new customer service executive over the next three years. The company also incorporated the customer service courteousness and helpfulness that us visible in the hospitality industry. Historically, Comcast is not very well-known for its customer service and its rivals like AT&T U-verse, Verizon FiOS and Century Link Prism were better known for their after sales, service, and customer handling professionalism. Hence this was a significant strategic change by the company.

As part of the enhanced customer service facilities and reduction of customer complaints, the company introduced a system where a customer can simply leave a message and an agent would call back the customer within a 15-minute time frame. The company has upgraded the communications system and call waiting has reduced by a staggering 18 times.

Increased remote monitoring the proper functioning of the set-top boxes and its routers has helped the company to keep the call volume under manageable limits even with a customer base of over 23 million. This customer centric strategy of the company has helped it to reduce customer complaints and increase customer satisfaction. An example is that the remote monitoring and control has enabled the company to solve problems before they happen as the company is able to know about the problem before it is about to happen. Another example is the targeting of tardy technicians so that they do not arrive even a minute late which draws a fine of $20 subtracted from the office where the technician works. This has reduced late appointments by 29%. The company also has equipped many of the trucks of technicians with GPS (Carter, 2016).

The company has been able to achieve healthy operational metrics and added 666,000 customer relationships which is 86% more compared to a year earlier (Corporate.comcast.com, 2016). The company also managed to achieve lower repeat tech visits and faster answering of phone calls. This strategy has helped the company to make gains in customer support and service in almost all the segments of video and internet.

Another strategic customer centric change is the forceful implementation of X1 service which is a cloud-based service and the company is hence able to easily and quickly update the platform to incorporate new features and enhancements.

To enhance the experience of the customers, the company recently introduced the Xfinity TV app that allows customers to turn their devices — laptops, mobile or tablets, into TVs. Hence customers are able to view nearly the entire channel line-up on their devices. Even while customers are outside their homes, they are able to watch approximately 100 streamed live TV networks and get access to their DVR recordings.

The results were visible in the internet customer number where 1.4 million new high speed data customers were added in 2015 alone and was the best in the last 8 years. As a result of the above strategy the company claims that it has managed to drive growth of the company and increase revenue by 20% in 2015.

Analysis of the Current Strategy

The capability of an organization to anticipate and then adjust to the environmental changes is referred to as strategy or strategic change and is based on an open system of models. The preparation and how to respond to environmental changes in the future is the essence of strategic change and strategy (Collins & Winrow, 2010). The optimal use of the resources available with the company and the internal and external environment that the company is functioning and competing in and the process of formulation and implementation of the company objectives and goals are fundamental to strategy formulation and strategic management.

With respect to Comcast, the company has followed the classic definition of strategic management and strategy formation. With the rivals seemingly doing good in terms of customer satisfaction, the company chose to strategize its operations with customer satisfaction at the ore. The company formulated strategies and means so that they are able to serve customers better and reduce customer complaints (“Strategic business planning: a dynamic system for improving performance & competitive advantage,” 2003).

For this purpose, the company chose to be innovative. Realizing that satisfying customers was the ultimate in the cable business, the company adopted the strategy less than a year ago and claims to be successful in the results it got. While the revenues increased, customer calls became manageable and customers are reportedly more satisfied.

In any form of business, customers are the ultimate deciders. Customers are the ones who purchase products and services and help companies and firms to generate revenues. In competitive markets and industries, the companies and firms that can attract and hold on to customers more than other succeed and attain sustainability compared to those who cannot do so. Customers are the ones who help create or damage brand image and company reputation. In competitive environments and industries, creating a loyal band of customers is very critical and goes a long way in establishing companies financially (Jeyarathnam, 2008). A prime example is Apple whose loyal band of customers has kept the company at the top of the smart phone industry.

Hence to succeed in the highly competitive U.S. cable and entertainment industry, Comcast’s decision to adopt a complete customer centric strategy is apt. the company has also sought to be innovative in attaining this. Apart from hiring 5,500 customer care executives, the company has undertaken a number of innovative strategies. The remote monitoring and control of set top boxes and routers and the solving of problems even before they occur to ensure reduced customer complaints and calls is an example of innovation. Another innovative step is the installation of GPS in the tech’s trucks so that they can be monitored and ensure 100% call time adherence.

Recommendation

From the above discussions it is clear that the latest business process strategy adopted by Comcast is apt for the competitive U.S. cable industry. The strategy adopted by the company would go a long way in reestablishing its market share and lapping up more customers. It is advised that the company continue with the present strategy and conjure up more innovative solutions for the satisfaction of customers.

Current Event Blog 3

For this part of the question we select the news of the merger of Pfizer and Allergan which appeared in an article titled “Pfizer, Allergan Agree on Historic Merger Deal” in The Wall Street Journal on November 22, 2015. The article talks about the merger to two pharma companies Pfizer and Allergan and the value of the deal was more than $150 billion. The merger which is to be completed in 2016 would end up creating the world’s biggest drug making company maker (Rockoff & Mattioli, 2015)

The deal between the two companies is very strategic. Pfizer is one of the larger pharma companies that is based in the U.S. In comparison Allergan is a smaller company and is based in Dublin in Ireland. This deal is what analysts call a reverse merger where the smaller company buys out the larger company 0- in this case Allergen buys out Pfizer. While this might sound somewhat surprising for many, this is one of the trends in modern business and a very strategic business move. Though technically the smaller company buys out the larger one, in truth the reigns of the new company formed by the merger or the takeover remains at the hands of the bigger company — in this case Pfizer (Cooper & Finkelstein, 2009).

The strategic reason for the move by the American company Pfizer is to save taxes. Through the merger with Allergan, Pfizer would be able to move abroad and out of the U.S. and take advantage of the lower rates of corporate tax overseas. In this case the headquarters of the new company would be based in Dublin where the rates of corporate taxes are significantly lower than that in the U.S. The strategy by the U.S. company is to be able to save taxes and thereby generate more profits.

In the article, Pfizer Chief Executive Ian Read has been quoted to be saying that the high rates of corporate tax in the U.S. has put the American companies in a position of competitive disadvantage compared to international rival pharma companies. The corporate tax rate for Pfizer in the U.S. is 25% and is among the highest in eh global pharma industry. As a result, the company had been making consistently reduced profits in comparison to its competitors based in other countries which included some U.S. companies which had moved abroad. Since the company was making lesser profits, it could only devote limited money and finances for research and development as well as for expansion projects. Thus the higher tax rates were proving to be an impediment to some of the other strategic programs of the company. The merger with Allergan would reduce the corporate tax rate for the company to less than 20%.

Apart from this another strategic reason for Pfizer for the merger is that the deal would provide the company access to top-selling products that includes anti-wrinkle treatment Botox of Alllergan. The combined range of drugs and vaccines would cover a significantly larger range of diseases compared to the coverage singularly available to the companies. another strategic advantage for Pfizer is the high growth rate of Allergan as well as the combined huge R&D budget for the new merged company that would become available. The combined company will have more resources to devote to drug research and development (Vivas Lopez, 2005). This deal would also give Pfizer greater leverage while it negotiates with health plans, drug benefit manager and hospitals in relation to prices of medicines (Rockoff & Mattioli, 2015).

Discussion Question: Strategy Planning and Formulation

Cell phone manufacturing industry is one of the most competitive industries. There are a large number of manufacturers in this industry spread across the world. There are also a large number of models and features for available in cell phones and smart phones. Yet here are some companies that are leaders and way ahead in terms of popularity, turnover, market share and profits than most others in this industry.

South Korean company Samsung and U.S. based company Apple are among the top two companies in this industry. Both these companies have some of the most unique strategies in terms of product creation and marketing. One of the most significant aspects of their strategy is customer focus. Both these companies have intensive market research and customer feedback strategies as well as marketing strategies that distinguish them from other companies.

For Apple, the creation of a loyal band of customers has been one the prime strategies for the company over the years. The company has taken up a strategy to offer products that are of the best quality with unique features. The company is also very sensitive towards customer complaints and customer feedback. The company is also in the habit of offering upgrades to existing products and brands continuously. With a focus on research and development the companies set aside a sizeable amount of money for this purpose every year.

This strategy is very similar to what the top companies in the cell phone manufacturing industry follow including Samsung — the biggest cell phone producer of the world in terms of shipped units. Most of the products of the top companies in the industry have some unique feature or the other. The products tend to be unique and different from the competitors and thus are able to get customer attraction. Having created such a history of innovative products, companies like Apple and Samsung and a few of the other top companies in cell manufacturing, have been able to create a niche for themselves.

Thus the technological strategy of innovation and the marketing strategy of being customer centric are the recipe for success of the top companies in the cell manufacturing industry.

Module 4 — Case Assignment

Strategy Implementation & Evaluation

The thesis statement for this question is as follows:

“The successful implementation of the strategic management plan in a large corporation like Comcast is highly reliant on measurement and evaluation efforts during and after the implementation phase.”

Discussion

I agree to the thesis that every strategy, despite how marvelous it is and how innovative it is, requires proper execution. While properly executing a strategy, it is also important that the strategy is monitored on a regular basis and evaluated at regular intervals to measure the success of the strategy implementation.

The significance of the evaluation of strategy is to be linked to the ability of the company to co-ordinate the tasks that are performed by managers, groups and departments under an ambience of control of performance. Development of inputs for fresh strategies, importance of gaining feedback, appraisal and rewards, developing of a process of strategic management and evaluating the validity of a strategic choice are among the factors that lend importance to strategic evaluation and monitoring (Sadler, 2003).

For a successful process of strategy implementation companies need to first set benchmarks for performance. Setting of benchmark allows companies to set levels and goals, generally in the short-term, that the company wants to achieve. This also sets the goal that the company intends to achieve at the end of the time period of new strategy implementation. Benchmarking also ascertains the how the company intends to achieve the goals. The special requirements that are necessary for performing the main task of the strategy has to be identified as well as the indicator of performance that judges the evaluation of success. The assessment of performance is done using quantitative as well as qualitative criteria. On the quantitative criteria indicators like net profit, earning per share, ROI, rate of employee turnover, cost of production, etc. are benchmarked. Aspects like skills and competencies, flexibility, risk taking potential, etc. are the qualitative factors for evaluation of strategic implementation.

Measurement of performance is necessary for any company implementing a strategy or a strategic change. The system of reporting and communication within the company helps in performance measurement. Performance measurement is generally done by comparing actual performance to the benchmarked levels of performance. Strategy evaluation is made easier by the availability of appropriate means for the measurement of performance and proper setting of standards in the right manner (Harris, 2011).

Strategy implementation also requires to take into consideration the possibility of corrective measures after measurement and evaluation. This corrective actions need to be taken with respect to the difference between the actual performance and the benchmarked performance so that the ultimate goal of the strategy is achieved. In this case the organizational potential of the company is considered and if it is found that benchmarks are not reached despite the organization performing to full capacity then the benchmark needs to be lowered (Farzad, 2014).

Taking into account the above discussion, we can analyze how Comcast set strategies and how the company managed to implement the strategy either successfully or unsuccessfully. We consider two strategies that bear two different results for the company:

The first is the proposed mega merger deal between Comcast and Time Warner Cable. The deal which was worth $45 billion did not happen despite both the companies deciding to get together for business advantages. However, there were severe external pressures from within the industry as well as the regulatory bodies that forced the scrapping of the deal.

The primary opposition to the deal had come from the regulators who were against the deal. The reason for this was that the regulators felt that the new company that would have been formed by the merger of the two of the largest companies in the industry would have violated the principles of fair trade though the creation of an entity that would have the power and incentive that could have affected the future of video streaming in their favor. The mega merger would have created a customer base for the new company that would have amounted to over 30 million which was just around under 30% of the total number of customer of the U.S. pay television market (Farzad, 2014).

This is a classic case where the strategy of a company for market expansion and through merger failed due to improper planning and execution. While forming the strategy and the plans to merge the two companies, Comcast did not take into account the possible reactions that could have emerged in the business environment due to the proposed merger. There was severe opposition from various sections of the government authorities, the business rivals and the society against the deal (Kessenides, 2014).

Secondly, Comcast did not follow up adequately one the post proposal for merger with reconciliatory steps and measures to communicate effectively with all the concerned stakeholders that would ensure that there was no threat to the market from the merger. There were heightened concerns about monopoly resulting from the merger as the new merged company would have control of more around 30% of the market for streaming video. There was also concerns that the aggressth3 ive marketing techniques that the two companies follow would create more customers and soon enough the new single company could control the entire market. There were fears that in the future the merged company would have had the power to control the content of video streaming and command as much money as they wanted as they would have had control over the majority of the market. Study into the articles and literature that appeared throughout 2015 about the issue showed that Comcast made very few efforts to effectively communicate their side of the story to the concerned stakeholders.

It is clearly evident that the major roadblocks to the proposed deal were the market regulators and a section of the customers. This aspect was clearly not properly evaluated by Comcast while the strategy for the merger was drawn up. The Department of Justice (DoJ) was one of the major road block to the strategy. It was in fact opposition from the DoJ that was even ready to challenge the proposed deal in a court of law. Comcast had not made proper evaluation of this aspect of the deal strategy and hence the deal failed to materialize. And it was not hard for Comcast to have anticipated the reaction of the DoJ as it had earlier blocked proposed takeover bid of T-Mobile by AT&T in 2011 and that of the merger of tax preparer H&R Block and TaxAct. Therefore, it was the inability in the strategy planning as well as in the evaluation of the deal that did not allow Comcast to be successful with the deal which would have been very beneficial for them business wise.

A section of ‘buyers’ too were against this merger as there were concerns about the reduction of buyer power following the merger. The deal would have created the largest company with the largest share of the market. This coupled with the potential for Comcast to grow, would have given the potential to Comcast to control the streaming content and the pricing of the content. This would not have been ideal in terms of fair business from the buyers’ perspective. And thus there was opposition to the deal. Comcast o their part also did not properly evaluate the reaction of the buyers’ from the merger and did not take steps to negotiate the potential opposition of the deal by the buyers.

This lack of initiative and evaluation by Comcast is evident from various articles and one in particular published in ‘USA Today’ under the title “How Comcast, Time Warner Cable deal unraveled” on April 25, 2015. The article states that the executives from Comcast met up with the officials of DoJ and the Federal Communications Commission not until the last days when the deal was nearly written off by the regulatory authorities. The article points out that the executives of Comcast were convinced that the deal would pass through “despite the loud and determined opposition from consumers and advocacy groups” (USA TODAY, 2015). However when the company started to hastily react to the situation to save the deal and implement the strategy, it was almost too late. Hence this can be considered to be a case where Comcast did not manage to implement a strategy due to lack of evaluation and improper management of the implementing process.

On the other hand, another strategy by Comcast to shift its business focus and policy to become customer centric in 2015 seems to be paying rich dividends. In May of 2015, the company announced that all its policies and business processes would now be customer oriented. The company would have the customer at the core of all the policies and decision it takes in the future.

And the company did not only stop at making the announcement. The company announced the hiring of 5,500 executives for customer care. These customer care agents would cater to the phone calls and complaints of customers and ensure that the problems are seedily disposed of. The company had made immediate recruitment of such customer care personnel and placed them at their offices throughout the U.S. The company also began special training of the existing staff members to deal better with customers. The company announced that it attempts to attain the courteousness and warmth of customer care as is seen in the hospitality industry. Comcast also introduced innovative measures such as equipping the tech’s vas with GPS so that they do not land up even a minute late for calls.

The company had taken constant evaluation measures to measure the success of the strategy. This they did with measuring the number of complaints calls and the number of repeat calls for technical faults. The company also measured from time to time the number of upgrades to software for applications. According to the annual report of the company for 2015, it claims that the customer centric strategy with special focus on addressing the customer complaints has helped in reducing customer calls by 20%. This is an example where the company has used evaluation and monitoring to effectively implement a strategy.

Current Event Blog 4 — Strategy Implementation & Evaluation

Discussions

As the industry says it – a la carte will usher in an era of survival of the fittest. This is the latest trend that TV cable companies in the U.S. are starting believe in more and more as the taste and demands of the customers’ change. Today a large section of the customers are not ready to pay for hundreds of bundled channels most of which they do not want to watch. Instead, since the last few years, customers are preferring to switch on to streaming video services where they can choose the channels and programs that they want to watch. This is what is termed as ‘a la carte’ package.

However, it is also a fact that most of the major cable channels have for long, tried to resist the “a la carte” approach which allows customers to pick and choose channels which they want to watch and are willing to pay for instead of paying for a 300+ bundle of channels. The primary premise for resisting ‘a la carte’ approach was that the approach would have an increased bill for customers with limited diversity in channels to watch. However, while this is sometimes true for cable television, it is accepted that the approach is fast catching on for the internet video streaming services — Netflix is a bright example of such an approach that has been successful (Heuman, 2011).

With rumors that tech companies like Apple are ready to roll out their digital TV services based on ‘a la carte’ approach, it has created pressures on the traditional cable TV companies offering broadband services and cable TV. The competition is getting tough and rumors are that Apple’s TV service would have a 25-channel “small” bundle but with major broadcasters such as ABC, CBS, Fox, and also FX and ESPN at $30 to $40. However, there has not been any confirmation from Apple (Gizmodo.com, 2015).

Despite this, traditional cable channels have been put under pressure and are finding it tough to hold on to customers as more and more customers are willing to cut their cable connection for online video streaming services. There are also rumors that many more companies want to get involved and provide patchwork (Rennhoff & Serfes, n.d.). This has forced cable companies Comcast to start offering TV programs on a la carte basis to customers both for cable TV as well as for internet video streaming services. There were reports in 2015 that the company – the largest cable company in the U.S., will start a streaming TV service some time in 2016. This service would be available to the internet customers of the company which would also include DVR storage on cloud networks for as low as $15 a month.

An article written by Jeff Kagant titles “Comcast Bucks Negative Cable TV Trend” published in renowned online magazine and advanced financial data portal “Equities.com” published on February 8, 2016, states that despite Comcast doing good in 20155, it is necessary that the company slowly shift to ‘a la carte’ approach. One of the reasons of success for the company amidst a generally slowing cable TV industry is the offering of smaller bundles of channels for the customers by Comcast.

The articles says: “Today, Comcast is winning with smaller bundles, but they would win even more if they give customers the ability to create their own bundle or a-la-carte. Will they move in this new direction since this is the new direction the industry is heading in? That’s the million-dollar question” (Trend, 2016). This clearly indicates that Comcast has realized the threat from online a la carte channel offerings and its rising popularity. To this respect, the company been preparing for to meet this challenge offered by the business environment and the changing tastes and demands of customers and has been slimming the product offerings in terms of the number of channels as well as the price.

The article further states: “Threats to Comcast and the entire cable television industry are increasing. They come from companies like AT&T DirecTV and Uverse, Verizon FiOS, CenturyLink (CTL) Prism, Netflix (NFLX), Amazon.com (AMZN), Google, Hulu and many more. This new competition and new technology is changing the entire cable television industry. In this environment every company must transform or weaken” (Trend, 2016). This indicates that Comcast has to adjust not only to the changing customer demands but also to the technologies for viewing TV programs that are available to customers. If customers have the option to pick and choose and pay for only those channels that they want to view and at the right price, then they would shy away slowly from cable TV moreover online services can be made available at any time and at any place. And hence Comcast has realized the importance and is potentially ready to change finally to an a la carte approach for offering services.

Another article titled “How Consumer TV Habits Are Changing” that appeared in Fox Business on February 9, 2016 says: “Globally, 2013 marked an interesting crossover point — where more people have reduced or eliminated their TV packages than increased them” (MoneyTips.com, 2016). It states that 23% people discontinued their cable TV compared to 14% who subscribed to it. The same figures in 2012 were 14% and 21% respectively. The primary reason for this was attributed to the higher costs and the limited usage of traditional cable TV. The article states that there are multiple TV program viewing modes that are being used by households these days and that not only includes additional TV sets at home but more on devices based on the internet. This shows the increased role, importance and popularity of video streaming that are being offered by more and more companies.

These two articles clearly suggest that video streaming is gaining popularity due to the ability where customers are able to choose what channels to view and what to pay for them. This essentially is the ‘a la carte’ approach which cable companies need to move towards. Comcast, which is among the largest cable companies in the U.S. and the largest broadband service provider, seems to have realized this. And in terms of technology, the company is perfectly poised to provide a la carte services to customers at least through its broadband services. However, the company has been moving towards reducing the number of channels in bundles and hence has been able to do well despite the entire industry slowing down. This is an attribute that is applicable only to it and it can be said that it is poised to start offering a la carte services.

Discussion Question: Strategy Implementation and Evaluation

Short-term and long-term business strategies are fixed by companies through management tools and applies strategy through evaluation and measurement. Company objectives and goals and internal and external factors are among the considerations that companies take in to account why formulating and implementing strategies (Nag, Hambrick and Chen, 2007).

The cell phone industry is a high growth and highly dynamic industry. There is severe competition among the companies that are engaged in the making of cell phones. The industry is composed of all types of products that range from the basic models to the very high end ones. The features and characteristics of these phones also vary according to price and models.

Over the years, the demands and tastes of customers are changing. The customers are looking for more value addition to the services that are offered or are available in a cell phone. It is no longer just a means to communicate only. It is used for various other uses apart from just talking. And customers have a tendency to choose those with the most features and add on’s provided that the price is right. This has necessitated that the companies constantly come up with products that are different from the competitors’. In this aspect it becomes most important that cell phone manufacturing companies constantly innovate and be creative so that it can gain leverage in the market and among the customers.

Leaders in the industry such as Apple and Samsung have been able to get to the top of the industry among the hundreds of companies and hold on to the positions as they have constantly given products that are innovative and different from one another. Such leading companies have always provided product upgrades a number of times within a year. This is a vision that has been developed in the companies and incorporated into the corporate culture of the companies. Leadership in these companies have constantly fostered differential thinking and innovation and this is the reason that the companies have been able to provide innovative products and maintain their position as leaders in the industry. The companies have also successfully implemented the strategy of innovation regularly to such an extent that it has become second nature for the company, the staff and the leaders.

Reflective Discussion

This session has been very informative and educational for me. The session has clearly made me realize the importance of strategy formation and the importance of implementation of strategy. It has helped me identify the factors that allow for strategy formation and how to incorporate the organizational goals and objectives into the strategy. The session has helped me learn the role and importance of evaluation and measurement of strategy at various stages, to set bench marks of performance and how to compare and measure performance to benchmarks.

These are important point when one assumes the role of a manager and when one is given the responsibility of forming a strategy for a company. The session also helped me understand that there can be several roadblocks to a strategy implementation and how to identify potential impediments and prepare beforehand to negate them. The session has also helped me understand the value of innovation and customer centric approach to business and how that has helped the top companies in the world to be successful. For example, the existing zero customer call target of Comcast and the possibility of moving towards a la carte system for cable companies are two very customer centric approaches that have helped Comcast to do well despite the rest of the industry not doing so well. I intend to use these valuable observations in the future.

References

Business success: Strategic unit comprehensive computer-based Expert support system. (1991). Long-Range Planning, 24(3), 107-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(91)90212-7

Carter, T. (2016). Comcast rolls out strategy for new emphasis on customer care. Mississippi Business Journal, p. 1. Retrieved from http://msbusiness.com/2015/05/comcast-rolls-out-strategy-for-new-emphasis-on-customer-care/

Collins, M., & Winrow, B. (2010). Porter’s generic strategies as applied toward e — etailers post — e Leegin. Journal Of Product & Brand Management, 19(4), 306-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10610421011059621

Cooper, C., & Finkelstein, S. (2009). Advances in mergers and acquisitions. Bingley: Emerald Group Pub.

Corporate.comcast.com,. (2016). 2015 Letter to Shareholders. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/2015-shareholder-letter

Corporate.comcast.com,. (2016). 2015-Year in Review. Retrieved 13 February 2016, from http://corporate.comcast.com/news-information/news-feed/2015-year-in-review

Farzad, R. (2014). Comcast-Time Warner Cable’s Jolt to Big Media. Businessweek.com. Retrieved 14 February 2016, from http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-02-14/comcast-time-warner-cables-jolt-to-big-media

Gizmodo.com,. (2015). What It Will Really Cost to Ditch Cable for A la Carte TV. Retrieved 14 February 2016, from http://gizmodo.com/what-it-will-really-cost-to-ditch-cable-for-a-la-carte-1691936269

Harris, E. (2011). Strategic Project Risk Appraisal and Management. Strategic Direction, 27(4). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sd.2011.05627dae.001

Heuman, J. (2011). “I Don’t Want to Pay for What I Don’t Watch”: The Cultural Politics of A la Carte Cable Television and the Cultural Life of Communication Policy. Communication, Culture & Critique, 4(1), 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01091.x

Jeyarathnam, M. (2008). Strategic management. Mumbai: Himalaya Pub. House.

Kessenides, D. (2014). Three Reasons Comcast’s Mega-Deal Could End Up in Court. Businessweek.com. Retrieved 14 February 2016, from http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2014-02-14/three-reasons-comcasts-mega-deal-could-end-up-in-court

MoneyTips.com,. (2016). How Consumer TV Habits Are Changing — Fox Business. Fox Business. Retrieved 14 February 2016, from http://www.foxbusiness.com/features/2016/02/09/how-consumer-tv-habits-are-changing.html

Rennhoff, A., & Serfes, K. Estimating the Effects of a la Carte Pricing: The Case of Cable Television. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1085392

Rockoff, J., & Mattioli, D. (2015). Pfizer, Allergan Agree on Historic Merger Deal. The Wall Street Journal, p. 1. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/pfizer-allergan-on-cusp-of-merger-deal-1448217490

Sadler, P. (2003). Strategic management. Sterling, VA: Kogan Page.

Strategic business planning: a dynamic system for improving performance & competitive advantage. (2003). Choice Reviews Online, 41(02), 41-1020-41-1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/choice.41-1020

Trend, — <. (2016). —
USA TODAY,. (2015). How Comcast, Time Warner Cable deal unraveled. Retrieved 14 February 2016, from http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2015/04/24/how-comcast-deal-to-buy-time-warner-cable-fell-apart/26313471/

Vivas LA3pez, S. (2005). Competitive advantage and strategy formulation. Management Decision, 43(5), 661-669. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251740510597699

---

Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply

Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?

Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.

Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?

• Plagiarism free papers
• Timely delivery
• Any deadline
• Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
• Subject-relevant academic writer
• Adherence to paper instructions
• Ability to tackle bulk assignments
• Reasonable prices
• 24/7 Customer Support
• Get superb grades consistently

 

Online Academic Help With Different Subjects

Literature

Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.

Finance

Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.

Computer science

Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!

Psychology

While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.

Engineering

Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.

Nursing

In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.

Sociology

Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.

Business

We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!

Statistics

We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.

Law

Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.

What discipline/subjects do you deal in?

We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.

Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?

Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.

What if I don’t like the paper?

There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.

Reasons being:

• When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
• We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.

In the event that you don’t like your paper:

• The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
• We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
• Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.

Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?

Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.

What if the paper is plagiarized?

We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.

When will I get my paper?

You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.

Will anyone find out that I used your services?

We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.

How our Assignment  Help Service Works

1.      Place an order

You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.

2.      Pay for the order

Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.

3.      Track the progress

You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.

4.      Download the paper

The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.

PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!

---