Posted: May 24th, 2022
intra-industry international trade within the standard international trade classification SITC6, which represents manufactured foods classified chiefly by material. The scope of this paper is limited to processed foods, and includes analytical frameworks from the gravity model, and classic approaches to product differentiation, product commoditization, pricing, and market structure.
References to market structures in the literature typically oversimplify the dynamics influencing the development of market types — perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly — and this tendency is exacerbated when the focus is on intra-industry trade. Further, the distinctions become considerably more obfuscated when companies that are in the same trade do business in both domestic and international markets. A global manufacturing strategy is the goal of most multinational companies, and rationalizing manufacturing strategies is an objective for nations, as well (Lee, 1984). For instance, assume that a country has the industrial infrastructure to produce canned beverages, but there are few natural resources to support the industry, productivity is low and is only growing slowly. These are the countries to which a company should locate new production. The reason for this is that global strategic advantage in manufacturing is generated predominantly by “logistical economies of scale, purchasing economies of scale, global experience, and production economies of scale” (Lee, 1986). The new competitiveness goes beyond one country producing all commodities cheaper than other countries — outperforming international competitors is insufficient for the contemporary market (Lee, 1984). The metrics to watch today indicate whether a company is performing better relative to its own economy than a competitor performs relative to its own economy.
Economies of Scale
The literature points to a positive link between economies of scale and intra-industry trade (Brander and Krugman, 1983; Sharma, 2002). According to Harrigan (1984), examining the volume of trade directly is preferable to examining the proportion of intra-industry trade. In his words, “there is some evidence in favor of the proposition that the volume of trade is higher in sectors with large scale economies, but that inference is somewhat sensitive to the choice of proxy” (Harrigan, 1984). Consider the matter of transport costs: The welfare effects of intra-industry trade can increase if transport costs are low and remain low. However, if transport costs are high, the intra-industry opening up of trade can bring about a decline in welfare — essentially, “the precompetitive effect is dominated by the increased waste due to transport costs” (Brander and Krugman, 1983). Where economies of scale produce benefit in an industry, countries are restrained from themselves producing a full range of products in that industry. This dynamic can shape a platform and scope for the exchange of similar products between countries (Sharma, 2002).
Monopolistic Competition and the Gravity Model of Trade
In monopolistic competition, many sellers exist in an industry and/or a number of good substitutes for the produced goods exist, but companies still retain a degree of market power. Monopolies are characterized by an absence or lack of substantive economic competition in the production of a good or service. A lack of viable substitutes for an industry’s goods or services conditions the establishment of a monopoly. An example of a processed food item for which there is both limited supply and no viable substitute is the elderflower. Limited supplies of the blossom of the elderberry trees are available each spring, and several products, including a sugary syrup that is used for beverages and cooking, are made from the elderflower. The popularity of a liquor produced by San Germaine and a version of Aquavit called Hallands Flader have contributed to demand for the elderflower — the price for the flower, the syrup and the cordial remain high. There are no viable substitutes. Monopolies have market power and are able to avoid being price takers, as they would be in perfect competition. Without regulatory intervention, monopolies typically structure a market that enables them to maximize profit by limiting production of their goods and selling the goods at prices that are higher than would occur under conditions of perfect competition. For example, if a company believes that there is higher demand elasticity in foreign markets, the company will charge a higher price at home and a lower price in the foreign market. Brander and Krugman (1983) argued that this type of reciprocal dumping is an indicator of oligopolistic behavior and not standard monopolistic price discrimination. When the markets for homogeneous goods are segmented and competition is imperfect, intra-industry trade may occur as a result of “reciprocal dumping” (Brander and Krugman, 1983). Without the specialization that accompanies differentiated goods, firms may expand trade into other markets and undifferentiated goods — which means they do not forgo competitive advantage (Baier and Bergstrand, 2009). The fundamental driver of reciprocal dumping appears to be that companies perceive each national market as a separate (segmented) market for which distinct decisions can be made with regard to trade quantity (Brander and Krugman, 1983). In effect, each country assumes a Cournot perception in which a pre-determined profit-maximizing quantity is identified and fixed.
Trans-industry trade can involve several to many interacting markets in which a particular set of prices can bring about overall equilibrium or general equilibrium. The set of equilibrium prices is considered to be long-term prices, while actual prices are viewed as deviations from the equilibrium prices.
INTRA-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL TRADE CASE STUDY
[Type text] [Type text] [Type text]
INTRA-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL TRADE CASE STUDY
The gravity model of trade is a “parsimonious and tractable representation” of global economic interaction. The gravity model has found favor with researchers as a method to examine bilateral trade flow patterns and to analyze the effects of regional trade cooperation (Anderson, 2011). The tractability of the gravity model is largely attributable to its modularity, such that, comparisons can be made across several countries. The model articulates the distribution of goods and variables across country spaces that are influenced by gravity forces — which are conditioned in turn by the size of location-based economic activity (often represented by GDP) and the distances involved in the transactions (Anderson, 2011). The utility of the model’s modularity extends capacity to disaggregate data independently from models of market structure or models of production in full general equilibrium (Anderson, 2011). Disaggregation is also independent of scale and can apply to any goods or any regions, allowing inferences to be made about trade costs (Anderson, 2011).
The conventional model of gravity is derived from an analogy with Newton’s Law of Gravitation (Anderson, 2011). To whit: A corpus of labor, good, or other variables of production occurs at an origin (i) and (Yi) experiences attraction to a corresponding mass of demand at destination (j) (Ej), with the potential flow between the two locations is reduced by the distance between the origin-destination pairs (dij) (Anderson, 2007). The analogy is represented in a strict form as: Xij = YiEjdeij (Anderson, 2007).
The unit of analysis of intra-trade transactions is an origin-destination pair. Relative levels of attractiveness occur between the origin-destination pairs; the theory of bilateral flows is applied to the strength of the attraction between the elements of the pairs. Theoretically, any purchase can occur at multiple possible origins and any sale can have multiple possible destinations, such that, “any bilateral sale interacts with all others and involves all other bilateral frictions” (Anderson, 2011). The structural gravity model elegantly solves this problem of general equilibrium (Anderson, 2011).
Global oligopoly (Strategic Trade Policy)
Companies interact strategically in an oligopoly. The conventional theories regarding the economy of trade present models that differ for industries depending upon whether they are compete in business through importation, in which case they are likely to prefer protectionism, or whether they compete through exportation, which can result in a preference for industry protectionism (Milner & Yoffie, 1989). Given these positions, a large number of multinational industries look to the strategic trade policies that are currently undergoing scrutiny (Milner & Yoffie, 1989). The trade policies are considered strategic because they tend to support domestic free trade only if foreign markets open or the governments of foreign countries reduce the subsidies that they charge to firms (Milner & Yoffie, 1989).
Agglomeration Economies (External Economies of Scale)
Economies of agglomeration are described as the benefits that become available when firms locate in close proximity to one another — in other words, they agglomerate (Arribas, et al., 2009). These firms — through the economies of scale achieved, often realize savings and network effects — since suppliers and customers may cluster near the plants, too (Arribas, et al., 2009). In the case of processed foods, consider that various companies that lack the infrastructure for bottling and canning processed foods may all employ the services of a common bottler or canner (Arribas, et al., 2009). Locating the various companies close to the bottling or canning operation can help to keep transport costs down (Arribas, et al., 2009).
Food habits are becoming internationalized and developing economies are experiencing rapid urbanization (Sharma, 2002). Intra-industry trade of processed foods, particularly, is subject to influence by these factors and the variables of product differentiation and economies of scale. The Australian data includes one data set that consists of manufacturing commodity (SITC subgroups 5-8) and a second data set — categorically is referred to as broad manufacturing — combines commodity (SITC subgroups 5-8) and processed food (SITC subgroups 0-1) (Sharma, 2002). A 7-percent increase in broad manufacturing was seen from the 20-percent level achieved in 1979/1980 to 38% in 1992/1993 (Sharma, 2002). The primary driver of this increase is believed to be due to robust growth in intra-industry trade in commodity manufacturing that reached 29% in 1992/1993 from the 15-percent level of 1979/1980 (Sharma, 2002). The processed food sub-sectors that showed the most dramatic rise in Australia during the same time period were cereals, confectioneries, meat products, and tobacco products (Sharma, 2002).
As stated earlier in this paper, Brander and Krugman (1983) demonstrated that product differentiation generates intra-industry trade between countries, given between-consumer preference diversity and between-country demand similarity (Sharma, 2002). Product differentiation can be a form of horizontal differentiation, with different attributes — a form of vertical differentiation — which considers qualities — and a form of technological breakthrough, which results in an improved product range (Sharma, 2002).
The research findings of Sharma (2002) support the hypothesis that economies of scale and product differentiation contribute to intra-industry trade, but that trade protection tends to contribute to diminished levels of trade (Sharma, 2002). Australia and New Zealand exhibit close economic links and have a “long history of close economic integration, which has been further strengthened in recent years” (Sharma, 2002). Regardless, New Zealand’s small share of Australia’s overall trade appears not to significantly impact intra-industry trade in Australian manufacturing (Sharma, 2002).
According to the comparative advantage theory of trade, countries will focus on trade characterized by transactions that are complimentary with regard to access to raw materials and competitive advantage. Put simply, countries will tend not to trade the same products. There is no real advantage to be had by such transactions and — as the gravity theory of trade illustrates — when distances are great in the supply-demand exchange — the cost of transport can create disadvantage. When entire industry expands production in a particular geographic area, the average, long-run cost will be lower for each company in the industry in that region (Pugel, 2012). The difference between constant returns to scale and economy of scale is important: constant returns to scale indicate that increases in output and total cost will also increase proportionately, but average cost — as a result of this ratio — will be constant (Pugel, 2012). With economy of scale, however, the average cost can decrease as the quantity of output and the total cost increase (Pugel, 2012).
Ordinarily, economists consider the degree of product differentiation and economies of scale to be related to the level of intra-industry trade (Sharma, 2002). As Sharma (2002) and others have shown in their research that the coefficient of economies of scale is significant and does have an expected positive sign. However, the premise of this paper is that companies engaging in oligopolistic interactions bring about “trade in the absence of any of the usual motivations for trade: neither cost differences nor economies of scale are necessary” ((Brander and Krugman, 1983).
Anderson, J.E. (2011). The gravity model. Annual Review of Economics, 3. Boston College.
Arribas, I., Perez, F., and Tortosa-Ausina, E. (2009). Measuring globalization of international trade: Theory and evidence. World Development, 37(1), 127-145. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.03.009
Baier, S.I., and Bergstrand, J.H., (2009). Bonus vetus OLS: A simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation. Journal of International Economics. Retrieved http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022199608001062
Berstrand, J.H. (1985). The gravity equation in international trade: Some micro-economics foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 474-481. Doi: 10.2307.1925976
Brander, J.A. And Krugman, P. (1983, November). A “reciprocal dumping” model of international trade. Journal of International Economics, 15 (3/4), 313-321.
Hatab, A.R.A., Shoumann, N.A. And Xuexi, H. (2012). Exploring Egypt-China bilateral trade: dynamics and prospects. Journal of Economic Studies, 39 (3), 314-326
Harrigan, J. (1994). Scale economies and the volume of trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 321-321. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194679960?accountid=32521
Helpman, E. (1981). International trade in the presence of product differentiation, economies of scale and monopolistic competition: A chamberlin-heckscher-ohlin approach. Journal of International Economics, 11(3), 305-305. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/225176765?accountid=32521
Lee, W. (1986). Global economies of scale. Industrial Management, 10(9), 28-30. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/217781084?accountid=32521
Milner, H.V. And Yoffie, D.B. (1989, March). Between free trade and protectionism: Strategic trade policy and a theory of corporate trade demands. International organization, 43(2), 239=272. doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300032902
Pugel, T. (2012). International Economics (15th ed.) Chicago, IL: Irwin.
Sharma, K. (2002). How important is the processed food in intra-industry trade? The Australian experience. Journal of Economic Studies, 29(2), 121-130.
Sussawasd, S. (2012). Trade integration in East Asia: An empirical assessment. Modern Economy, 3, 319-329.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.