Posted: May 25th, 2022
Change Management Implications of Lenovo’s Acquisition of IBM Computer’s Personal Computer Division
Lenovo’s takeover of IBM PC is described as a ‘snake eating an elephant.’ — Ling Zhijun, “The Lenovo Affair: The Growth of China’s Computer Giant and Its Takeover of IBM-PC,” 2006
The epigraph above suggests that the recent acquisition of IBM Computer’s personal computer division by the up-and-coming Chinese concern Lenovo was a painful affair, and the scholarly literature concerning change management bears likewise suggests that there were some difficult challenges involved throughout the process as well. The early history of Lenovo is fairly unremarkable, with the company being first established in 1984 to sell computer parts manufactured under the IBM label. By 1990, though, Lenovo was selling personal computers under its own brand name and in May 2005, Lenovo purchased IBM’s computer division for $1.7 billion. Today, Lenovo holds more than 35% of the Chinese personal computer market, which is four times the market share held by Dell Computer in China. To determine how the company achieved this spectacular growth during a period when others struggled to survive, this paper provides a diagnosis of the situation, including a brief background of the company and the problem it encountered, a description of the intervention that was used, followed by an evaluation of the change and the strategy used to achieve it. A summary of the research and salient findings are presented in the conclusion.
Review and Discussion
Diagnosis.
Brief Background Information on the Organisation. According to the company’s Web site, “Lenovo is a global company with executive offices in Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, Beijing, China, and Singapore. Its principal operations are in Beijing, China, and Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, with an enterprise sales organization worldwide. The company employs more than 19,000 people worldwide” (“About Lenovo, 2007, p. 2). In reality, the history of Lenovo is not so different from that of many major competitors in the computer industry today (Tucker, 2006). Just as Jobs and Wozniak worked on their first personal computers in their garages at home, Lenovo was founded in 1984 by 11 engineers who worked out of a small bungalow in Beijing and went on to become a major force in the today information technology (it) industry (Zhijun, 2006). According to this author, “Lenovo’s story is far more than a simple business success story. It describes an astonishing period in China’s contemporary history as an era of austere, authoritarian economic and political policies gradually gave way to a market economy system — although it is a system that is still uniquely Chinese” (Zhijun, 2006 p. 62). The history of Lenovo can actually be traced by to 1956 when a group of 45 Chinese scientists visited the former Soviet Union to “see what a computer looked like” and “what applications it could be used for” (Zhijun, 2006 p. 62).
This information-gathering visit came during a tumultuous period in China’s history, being conducted amidst the former Chairman Mao’s “Great Leap Forward” initiative that caused so much havoc and devastation throughout the country (discussed further below). Amidst this political and social upheaval, though, the Chinese scientists managed to persevere and developed the country’s first computer dubbed, “Number 104” (Zhijun, 2006). This original computer was placed in service almost immediately and went on to provide valuable computing services for massive civil engineering projects and the country’s nuclear weapons programs (Zhijun, 2006). By 1971, new-generation computers were being built by these engineers and China was able to construct its first integrated circuit computer. Recognizing the unique opportunity that this convergence of time and place provided them, in 1984, these Chinese scientists-cum-entrepreneurs took advantage of the increasingly tolerant attitude towards private enterprise and created the Lianxiang company which was originally capitalized with the fees charged to organizations leasing time on these newly developed computers (Zhijun, 2006).
The Identification of the Problem/Opportunity. When the Lianxiang company, Lenovo’s predecessor, was formed, there were approximately 110,000 personal computers in China, almost all IBM models and all of them operating in English. According to Zhijun, “Perhaps the Lianxiang company’s most important initial achievement was to recognise the importance of developing a Chinese character computer system allowing 1.3 billion Chinese to enter the computing age. Lianxiang had the vision to opt for a character function that had what is described as ‘linked thought’ functionality” (2006 p. 63). This approach was congruent with one of Lianziang’s core competencies, which was importing IBM and other branded computers from the West on which the company installed this Chinese character function and began supplying China’s domestic market (Zhijun, 2006). This author concludes that, “Using the brand name Legend, Lianxiang promoted PC usage throughout China by enabling the translation of English software into Chinese characters. And from such comparatively modest beginnings a company was born that currently employs more than 19,000 people worldwide with $13 billion in annual revenues. In 1994, Legend was successfully listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange and in 2003 the company re-branded itself as Lenovo” (Zhijun, 2006 p. 63). In fact, the company went on to acquire more than 25% of the Chinese it market share in 2004 (Zhijun, 2006). These spectacular results reflect the original aims and objectives of the company to expand their domestic market while gaining access to the international market, and these issues are discussed further below.
Aims and Objectives of the Change. According to Dessler (2006), “Managers in China face an intensely competitive global industrial environment. With revenue streams still supported by fast-growing but increasingly competitive domestic demand, Chinese firms such as Lenovo Group are expanding abroad” (p. 11). As a result, Dickie (2005) suggests that Lenovo’s decision to acquire IBM’s personal computer division “was driven in large part by eroding margins in the PC business and the steady encroachment of foreign brands such as Dell into Lenovo’s dominance of a liberalizing Chinese market” (p. 4).
Brief Summary of the Change Strategy. The company’s change strategy in the acquisition of IBM’s personal computer division in 2005 reflected the goals of Lenovo’s leadership to gain access to the international marketplace, but it is likely that few observers would have expected such an aggressive tactic from this up-and-comer.
Selection of the Change Strategy. The change strategy selected for the acquisition of IBM’s personal computer division can be attributed to Liu Chuanzhi, one of the original 11 founders of the company, in response to increasing market demand for state-of-the-art personal computers at home and abroad. According to Zhijun (2006), “The battle between China and the West actually created the space for the creation of an indigenous company able to offer PCs on the Chinese market at an affordable price. The principal driving force behind the Lenovo company (or the Lianxiang company as it was first known in China), was one of its 11 founder members, Liu Chuanzhi,” who Zhijun describes as one of China’s most creative and decisive business leaders (p. 63). The U.S. business journal, Business Week, also ranked Liu Chuanzhi amongst the world’s top two-dozen businessmen (Zhijun, 2006).
Implications of the Change for the Organisation. The company’s unprecedented acquisition of IBM’s PC division in 2005 represented a major step for the company as well as a major incentive for Chinese industry across the board. Indeed, the acquisition of the IBM division was proof-positive that Chinese companies are not only capable of being competitive in their domestic markets but can also compete at a global level (Zhijun, 2006).
Intervention.
Description of the Change Management Process.
Like with any other type of corporate merger, the decision to acquire IBM’s personal computer division was the first step in the instant change management initiative.
The second step for Lenovo was to formulate a company-wide strategy and business model that would take the company in the right direction according to the dual goals of increasing its domestic market share while simultaneously gaining increased access to the international marketplace. To this end, Lenovo developed a new business model called it termed the “Dual Business Model” to achieve the goals of both the enterprise market (the relationship model) and the consumer market (the transaction model). According to Liao (2006), “The relationship model will be based on offering customized offerings and services to meet the needs of the larger enterprise customers. On the other hand, the transaction model will use a more efficient and reliable value chain, strong demand generation on attractive offerings, and the ability to adjust and react to market changes and competitor activities to deliver new Lenovo products” (p. 3).
The final step involved in the acquisition of the IBM PC business division was to resolve any remaining conflicts in corporate culture that might have existed between the Western managers and the new Chinese owners and develop a strategic alliance that could take advantage of both companies’ core competencies. In this regard, Wu (2005) noted early on, “Successfully integrating and sustaining the IBM brand will be a litmus test of Lenovo’s management savvy in the coming critical months” (p. 26). To achieve this crucial aspect of the change, Lenovo and IBM developed a strategic alliance that was designed to provide a best-in-class experience for enterprise customers. According to Liao (2006), “The companies have entered into significant, long-term agreements that give Lenovo customers preferred access to IBM’s world-class customer service organization and global financing offerings. This will enable Lenovo to take advantage of IBM’s powerful worldwide distribution and sales network. Lenovo’s customers are able to count on the entire IBM team – including sales, services and financing – for access to IBM’s legendary end-to-end it solutions” (p. 3). In addition, pursuant to IBM’s five-year contractual commitment, it will also provide Lenovo with warranty services and provide Lenovo customers with leasing and financing arrangements. According to Liao, “Through this long-term relationship, customers will receive the best products with the lowest total-cost-of-ownership” (2006 p. 3). Among the company’s initiatives in this final phase of the change management process were additional efforts to further support their new dual business model. To this end, Lenovo upgraded its technology to work with Microsoft’s newly launched Windows Vista operating system; likewise, the so-called “ThinkVantage” technology innovations from IBM that include biometric fingerprint scanning and rescue and recovery features, have been redesigned to operate seamlessly with the security and backup features offered by Vista (Liao, 2006).
Identification of the Key Events and Reactions. There are two fundamental reactions involved that may affect the company’s change management strategy over the long-term. The first reaction is from the Chinese stakeholders involved. In this regard, Zhijun (2006) reports that, “Perhaps one of the most interesting facts to emerge from the Lenovo Affair was the broadly nationalist sentiment that had grown amongst Chinese entrepreneurs driven, in the main, by a perception that there was a ‘plot by global Western enterprises to gulp up a large share of the Chinese market’” (p. 62). Given the country’s history of foreign domination, such perceptions might not be completely unfounded, but nevertheless, the implications for Lenovo’s stakeholders were the same: “Whether there was a basis to this paranoia or not, China’s ‘underlying anxiety’ only served to increase the West’s distrust of China which in turn fed Chinese antagonism towards foreign players” (Zhijun, 2006 p. 62).
The second reaction involves those of Western stakeholders. For instance, according to Tucker (2006), “The largest obstacle to China’s international corporate development is the nation’s communist political system, in which the government serves as a major stakeholder in all Chinese companies. Investor wariness over China’s chaotic banking system is also slowing the country’s rate of growth, as well as frustration over its currency model” (p. 12). The country’s banking system might be making foreign investors more cautious about forging joint venture relationships or other mergers, but it is the West’s reaction to the Chinese government that represents the most significant concern for Lenovo in the future. According to Tucker, “Another obstacle facing Chinese firms looking to establish brand-name recognition might be negative perceptions of either Chinese products or Chinese politics. Many consumers in the West regard the Chinese government as oppressive, environmentally reckless, and an egregious violator of human rights. Concerns about outsourcing and domestic job loss also color many Western consumers’ perceptions of China” (2006 p. 12). This observation is congruent with Wu’s (2005) assessment that, “Recent high-profile international acquisitions and take-over bids by Chinese companies have dramatically shifted media attention from spotlighting China as a ‘giant sucking vacuum cleaner’ for global inward foreign direct investment to characterizing the country as a cash-rich ‘predator’ embarking on a global buying binge” (p. 26).
Special Features of the Change. In his essay, “Do Financing Biases Matter for the Chinese Economy?,” Huang (2006) points out that a number of Western analysts have pointed to Lonovo’s acquisition of IBM’s PC business as a clear indication of the rising world-class domestic Chinese companies. According to Huang, “Using the success of firms like Lenovo as evidence, a McKinsey Quarterly article has gone so far as to claim that China has the ‘best of all possible models.’ These business analysts are unusually perceptive except in one detail: Lenovo is a foreign company” (p. 287). This means that the change involved in acquiring IBM’s PC division was achieved under less stringent laws and regulations than the company’s domestic competitors might have encountered in a similar move. For instance, as Huang (2006) notes, “All of the manufacturing, service, and R&D operations of Lenovo in China are legally organized as subsidiaries of its Hong Kong firm and as such they are subject to laws and regulations pertaining to FDI, rather than those far more restrictive laws pertaining to domestic private businesses. In 2003, seven of Lenovo’s Hong Kong subsidiaries were among China’s 500 largest foreign operations” (p. 288).
Instances of Resistance and/or Unexpected Difficulties Encountered. As noted above, Lenovo’s early years were forged during a turbulent period in China’s history, and it is reasonable to assert that lesser individuals might have not prevailed. In fact, the success of Lenovo today is not so much what the Chinese government has done to assist the company in crafting a business model that others now cite as an exemplar, but rather what they simply allowed the company’s leaders to do: leave the country and make the critical connections with business leaders abroad that have helped fuel the company’s meteoric growth every since. In this regard, Huang (2006) emphasizes that, “The story of Lenovo and its Hong Kong connections tells us about both what the Chinese policymakers have done right and what the limitations of their approach are. Amidst massive institutional inefficiencies, Chinese policymakers have done two things vitally right and important. One is that they have allowed FDI to come in; the other, which is underappreciated, is that they have allowed Chinese citizens to travel abroad since the early 1980s” (p. 287). This author makes the point that this ability to travel likely represents the single most important reason that some of the entrepreneurs.”.. could at least escape from the clutches of a very bad system. Thus, China’s success has less to do with creating efficient institutions but with allowing an escape valve from inefficient institutions” (Huang, 2006 p. 287).
Summary of Outcome Achieved. Today, Lenovo is poised to develop its markets around the world and the brand reached an enormous global audience as a major sponsor of the Olympic Winter Games in Torino in 2006 and will again during the 2008 summer games in Beijing (Zhijun, 2006).
Evaluation.
Redirection is a type of leadership is an attempt to redirect an organization, field, or product line from where it is headed toward a different direction (Sternberg, 2005). In this type of leadership, the organization’s leader makes the decision concerning which direction the organization is currently headed is less than adaptive, and therefore redirects the organization in other directions (Sternberg, 2005). In order to be successful, though, redirective leaders need to match to environmental circumstances (Sternberg, 2005). According to this author, “If they do not have the luck of matching environmental circumstances, their best intentions may go awry. Under Louis Gerstner, IBM transformed itself from a company that specialized in making computers, especially mainframe computers, to a company that specialized in information-technology services” (Sternberg, 2005 p. 37). The company’s leadership, though, determined that more changes were in order and this was the impetus behind the sale to Lenovo: “The company as it had been was dying and Gerstner redirected it. Even more recently, under Sain Palmisano, it sold its personal-computer division to a Chinese company, Lenovo. The transformation thus became complete” (Sternberg, 2005 p. 37).
The fact that a fundamental transformation took place within Lenovo as a result of the change suggests that some transformational leadership was used on the part of Lenovo, an assertion that is congruent with Bass’s (1997) analysis that such leadership styles are not restricted to Western leaders, but are rather universal: “The transformational paradigm views leadership as either a matter of contingent reinforcement of followers or the moving of followers beyond their self-interests for the good of the group, organization, or society by a transformational leader. The paradigm is sufficiently broad to provide a basis for measurement and understanding that is as universal as the concept of leadership itself” (p. 130).
Finally, the change management process used can be viewed from a transactional leadership perspective on the part of Lenovo’s leadership as well. In this regard, Warner (2000) reports that while transformational leadership is not unknown in China, a far more common leadership style used is transactional leadership. In his analysis of manufacturing companies and banks in China, although the most senior management did demonstrate a more transformational leadership styles, even in these cases, middle management and those in charge of personnel demonstrated the more transactional approach (Warner, 2000). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that this type of leadership style has also been used in the Lenovo acquisition of IBM’s personal computer business division.
Ethical Aspects of the Process. Notwithstanding the ethical implications of competitive edge afforded Lenovo’s leadership early on in being allowed to “leave the clutches of evil communism” in order to learn more about their business, the company’s leadership and others like them are increasingly being viewed as role models for the Chinese populace. According to the producer of a new television game show, “Win in China!,” that promotes business acumen among a receptive Chinese audience, “There is no religion in China, so it is very important to promote the right kind of values. Today for our society, the entrepreneur can be our hero” (emphasis added) (quoted in Fallows, 2007 at p. 72). While it “may be glorious to get rich,” this shift in values represents a profound change for the Chinese worldview, and its implications remain unclear for the future. In fact, Lenovo’s CEO was recently a contestant on this program and was regarded as highly popular. According to this analyst, the term “hero.” “.. might be going too far, but the participants on Win [in China!] seem to have been received in the press and blogs as modern Chinese role models” (Fallows, 2007 p. 72).
Predicted and Unforeseen Outcomes for the Organization’s Stakeholders. Even the company’s visionary leadership could probably not have imagined the success that Lenovo would enjoy in the three decades that followed its founding. Indeed, the company has modeled the way for others and now represents a viable business model for domestic and foreign companies alike. Citing the Lenovo acquisition of IBM’s PC business division as a good example, De Angelis (2006) points out, “In a period of 30 years we will have witnessed the transition from ‘sold in China’ to ‘made in China’ to ‘designed in China’ to ‘dreamed up in China’” (p. 31).
Effectiveness of the Change Management Process. According to Liao (2006), the change management process involved in the IBM PC division acquisition was enormously effective, at least in terms of the company’s bottom line. In fact, Lenovo is the current market leader in the Asia Pacific (excluding Japan) with 21%, followed by Hewlett-Packard (12.9%) and Dell (9%); moreover, the sales of the company’s new notebook computers have played a major role in the growth of the PC market and Lenovo currently has a 35% market share in China, making it the market leader in that country (Liao, 2006).
How the Process Could Have Been Improved. It is hard to argue with success, and given the company’s stellar performance over the past two years, it is even more difficult to perceive how the two companies could have better managed the process. Nevertheless, some issues did emerge from the research that suggest that Lenovo could have better managed the public relations aspects of the takeover to help allay the increasing fears of Western consumers that China has become “predatory.”
Conclusion
It is likely that many American consumers today can remember when the phrase “Made in Japan” meant inferior and shoddily made products, but that of course has changed. Likewise, while the term, “Made in China” has been met with some derision on the part of Western consumers in recent years, the handwriting is on the wall for all to see and the research showed that China is well poised to take advantage of its enormous investments in infrastructure and technology in recent years. The research showed that a Chinese firm named Lenovo was first established in 1984 to sell computer parts manufactured under the IBM label. By 1990, though, the company had become sufficiently prosperous to begin marketing personal computers under its own brand name. Finally, the research showed that in May 2005, Lenovo purchased IBM’s computer division for $1.7 billion and Lenovo now holds more than 35% of the Chinese personal computer market, which is four times the market share held by Dell in China.
References
About Lenovo. 2007. Lenovo: United States. [Online]. Available: http://www.lenovo.com/lenovo/us/en/.
Bass, Bernard M. 1997. “Does the Transactional — Transformational Leadership Paradigm Transcend Organizational and National Boundaries?” American Psychologist, 52(2), 130.
De Angelis, a.P. 2006, Spring. Don’t ‘dis’ Chinese science. Issues in Science and Technology, 22(3), 31.
Dessler, Gary. 2006. “Expanding into China? What Foreign Employers Should Know about Human Resource Management in China Today.” SAM Advanced Management Journal, 71(4), 11.
Dickie, M. 2005, October 19. “China: Starting a walk on the wild side: Going global strategy.” The Financial Times, 4.
Fallows, James. 2007, April. “Win in China! A Reality-TV Show Is Teaching the Chinese How to Succeed in Business.” The Atlantic Monthly, 299(3), 72.
Huang, Yasheng. 2006. “Do Financing Biases Matter for the Chinese Economy?” The Cato Journal, 26(2), 287.
Liao, Jerry. 2006, December 11. “Reality Bites: Dual Intentions: Lenovo Introduces Dual Business Model” Manila Bulletin, 3.
Sternberg, Robert J. 2005. “WICS: A Model of Giftedness in Leadership.” Roeper Review, 28(1), 37.
Tucker, P. 2006, January-February. “Made in China: Branding a New Image; from Manufacturer to Major Marketer, ‘Brand China’ Is Set to Boom.” The Futurist, 40(1), 12.
Warner, Malcolm. 2000. Changing Workplace Relations in the Chinese Economy. Basingstoke, England: Macmillan.
Wu, Friedrich. 2005, Fall. “China Inc., International: How Chinese Companies Have Discretely Internationalized Their Operations.” The International Economy, 19(4), 26.
Zhijun, L. 2006, August-September. “The Lenovo Affair: The Growth of China’s Computer Giant and Its Takeover of IBM-PC.” African Business, 323, 62.
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
Computer science is a tough subject. Fortunately, our computer science experts are up to the match. No need to stress and have sleepless nights. Our academic writers will tackle all your computer science assignments and deliver them on time. Let us handle all your python, java, ruby, JavaScript, php , C+ assignments!
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!
Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.